Supply of gambling and betting services

Supply of gambling and betting services casino indian wells

The WTO ruling took the gambling world by storm because it moved the possibility of fully and clearly legal online gambling closer to reality in the US and elsewhere. The parties subsequently requested a continuation of the suspension until 4 Octoberand the Panel agreed to the request on 18 August For several months, Antigua went through a pre-dispute negotiation process with the US in an effort to resolve the trade dispute.

On 25 Junethe Panel agreed to this request. The summary below can gambling addicting up-to-date at. The Appellate Body disagreed with the Dispute Panel's reasoning, but nevertheless ruled that the US could not establish the chapeau because the US either sanctioned or permitted "remote gambling" in the US, primarily in the form of off-track account wagering on horse races. On 21 MarchAntigua and Barbuda requested consultations with the US regarding measures applied by central, regional and local authorities in the US which affect the cross-border supply of gambling and betting services. The Panel has therefore agreed to resume the panel proceedings as from 8 November The Dispute Panel had found several reasons why the US could not meet the chapeau.

Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services –. Arbitration Pursuant to Article of the DSU. WT/DS WRITTEN SUBMISSION OF THE. UNITED. United States' ban on cross-border gambling and betting services. States – Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and. UNITED STATES – MEASURES AFFECTING THE CROSS-BORDER SUPPLY OF. GAMBLING AND BETTING SERVICES. AB

1 comments

Leave a Reply

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *